Tuesday, 16 March 2010
From a culture of war to a culture of peace
Tuesday, 2 March 2010
Looting following natural disasters: Why?
Thursday, 25 February 2010
Tennis players, wigs and Dubai assassinations: Welcome to the Middle East
Mahmoud al-Mabhouh (source: Getty)

While the investigation continues, conspiracy theories abound on Arab TV networks, as is usually the case in a region fraught with suspicion and undercover operations...
Sunday, 21 February 2010
Guns, Checkpoints and Pesto: Sense of Taste


Friday, 19 February 2010
Guns, Checkpoints and Pesto: Sense of Hearing




Tuesday, 9 February 2010
Guns, Checkpoints and Pesto: Sense of Smell

.jpg)
Thursday, 14 January 2010
Guns, Checkpoints and Pesto: Sense of Sight

Saturday, 12 December 2009
Guns, Checkpoints and Pesto: Sense of Touch
Living and working in conflict countries, or isolated villages in African jungles... definitely doesn't make that activity one of the easiest which, come to think of it, is what is most challenging and therefore interesting!
From India and Nepal to DR Congo and Uganda, through Palestine and Lebanon, I have had the opportunity to experience how different cultures enjoy food, how they prepare it and how it brings people together in a way which, in my opinion is still highly misunderstood and underestimated by conflict resolution experts.
On a moonlit evening in mid-June 2001, (15 days after the massacre of the Nepali Royal Family by the Crown Prince, in a Romeo and Juliette style drama of impossible love and feuding families), I sat on the floor of a mud and brick built kitchen with a family of 3 generations in a small village just outside Kathmandu. The dinner was being served by the grandmother and her daughter, assisted by her two granddaughters. The grandfather had slaughtered a small chicken in honour of my visit. The meal consisted of basmati rice (baht), lentils (dal) and the most tender chicken I have ever eaten in my life, cooked in a curry sauce, with crushed chillies and garlic. The plate now infront of me, legs crossed, sleeves up, all eyes on me to dig in first, I akwardly and with perfect clumsiness, scooped some dal baht in my right hand (the left hand being considered less clean, used for purposes which are outside the realm of the subject of this posting), and brought it all up to my mouth, praying for some divine intervention so it does not fall down onto my lap. The giggles of the children was proof enough of how ridicule their honoured guest must have appeared to them. Once I had chewed and swallowed my first mouthfull of the little food I did manage to salvage, the family took their eyes off me and started eating. With much relief, this gave me an opportunity to practice the art of hand eating, and after multiple attempts, I began to master it. From discomfort and clumsiness, it became pure joy and fun. The synergy that is created between you and the food, when you are using your hands, cannot be explained in words. It can only be experienced.


Thursday, 26 November 2009
The Never Before Campaign for Palestine
According to the campaign mission statement:
"The Never-Before-Campaign for Palestine is a Beirut-based campaign launched by individuals of different professional backgrounds, including sociologists, political scientists and communications experts.
The Never-Before-Campaign calls for a new approach to support Palestine, and its people, their cause and their resistance movements. This new approach veers away from the traditional competitions for victim-hood which usually seek to elicit the worlds pity. Pity only yields sympathy.
For decades, Palestinians have been treated, at best, as poor unfortunate beings who might deserve charity and maybe some humanitarian aid. Meanwhile, Israel decides, at its own leisure, which bits of the usurped rights to give back.
The Campaign aims at commanding respect. The world does not respect the meek, rather the powerful and the confident. The Palestinian people are victims here, but they are also resilient and determined. The Campaign seeks to communicate this image to the world.
In addition, the image of resistance, that has been suppressed for fear of being confused with terror, is also and integral part of the campaign. No cosmetics, no facades. A masked gunman is the current image of the Palestinian resistance, whether we like it or not. It is this masked freedom fighter facing the might of the Israeli army that makes us proud. The campaign does not succumb to Western sensitivities of the post 9-11 era.
The West and the whole world are at fault here, not the Palestinian people or the resistance movements. The Campaign addresses that issue: Palestine will not wait for Western remorse that always comes too late, such as for the Holocaust, Rwanda and South Africa.
The Campaign recognizes growing awareness about the Palestinian cause all over the world and builds on it. It targets different sets of audiences at the same time.
The Never Before Campaign has no political or religious affiliation, it only has one enemy. All those fighting for the same cause are allies to the Campaign. Our purpose is to make those allies as numerous as possible and to share the credit with them once our cause is victorious."
Saturday, 17 October 2009
Lebanon as a new non-permanent member of the UN Security Council
Friday, 11 September 2009
New Book: UN Ideas that Changed the World

The book provides a synthesis of findings and lessons learned from more than ten years of research by Jolly, Emmerij, Weiss.
The project’s central message is that over its entire history, the UN has played an important and often overlooked role in nurturing and pioneering a set of key action-oriented ideas. Many of these ideas have driven international agendas and catalyzed initiatives aimed at improving the quality of human life. Some examples include: providing an international economic framework for national development policies; setting global goals like the eradication of smallpox, around which action could be mobilized; and promoting a human development approach that emphasized going beyond basic needs to integrating economic and social development, human rights and elements of human security.
Thursday, 10 September 2009
Lebanon without a Government: 3 months and 3 days
Saad Hariri, PM designate

What most people outside Lebanon don't realise is how small this country is and subsequently how small the electorate is: 1.6 million people. That is the population of Brussels.
The twist in the story comes as follows. After the elections, the leader of the majority, Saad Hariri, son of slain Rafik Hariri, became PM designate. He was thus tasked to form his government and present an agreed upon cabinet line-up to the President of the Republic, Michel Suleiman.
This is the Middle East after all! Things are not that simple. Indeed, the opposition group, March 8, keen on being included in the future cabinet, demanded a fair amount of ministerial posts, including the strategic Ministry of the Interior as well as Telecommunications.
Telecommunications?! Would be the first question of a well educated, well politically versed Westerner... Of couse! Would be the response of a Lebanese, so used to the political ramblings of his/her country. I shall explain.
Michel Aoun has three daughters. No sons. In a country of family dynasties associated to political clientalism and power, that is a problem indeed. One of Aoun's daughters married a man called Bassil. Bassil, a somewhat short and clumsly looking fellow was pushed onto the political scene thanks to his father in law. He became Minister for Telecommunications in the previous government. Bassil was not re-elected by his constituents in the June 7th elections and therefore did not win a seat in Parliament. Aoun, being part of the opposition, demanded that Hariri include in his cabinet, Bassil once again as the Minister for Telecommunications, despite his lack of a constituency. Hariri categorically refused.
So why is Telecommunications such a strategic post? Well, do you remember Lebanon's 3 week crisis which led to the Doha agreement in May 2008? (see posting below, and followoing posts on the same subject, titled "Unrest in Lebanon: Day 3" on Friday 9th May 2008). The uprising of Hezbollah at the time was caused by a row over issues pertaining to the group's monopoly on a telecommunications network and its exclusive use, for security and intelligence purposes. Aoun is an ally of Hezbollah and his son in law, Bassil was Minister, apparently often sharing with Hezbollah, individual files through the ministry's capacity to intercept information from emails, phone calls and other forms of communication.
So voila, that is why that ministry is so important, and that is why, Lebanon has not had a government for the past 3 months. While Somalia is visibly a country without a government, Lebanon continues to function well. The Lebanese both don't really notice the lack of a government and don't really miss it.
This will sound strange to Western ears (we who are used to rules, structure, fines and punishment for bad deeds), but it is the lawnessness here that creates this sense of false stability. It is the lack of rules and regulations that oils the wheels of this country, while life goes on uninterrupted.
A few days ago, Hariri went ahead and presented a cabinet line-up (which had not been agreed on by the opposition) to President Suleiman, responsible for reviewing it and then accepting it. Of course, the opposition vehemently rejected the proposal and Suleiman, of couse, could not and would not sign it.
As a result, during the Iftar (the break of the fast at sunset during the holy month of Ramadan) organised yesterday evening at the Prime Minister's Office in the Grand Serail, Hariri hinted at stepping down and offering his letter of resignation to the President...
The United Nations' General Assembly will inaugurate its 64th Session in 5 days, on 15 September 2009. All heads of states members of the United Nations, address the General Assembly each year. How can Michel Suleiman address the United Nations without an effective government in place?.... Let's see if that is an incentive enough for majority and opposition to come to a consensus and quickly agree on a cabinet... an agreement which some say will be pushed by Syria and Saudia Arabia, on both fronts of the Lebanese divide....

Thursday, 3 September 2009
The Official White House Flickr Photostream
One of those projects is The Official White House Photostream on Flickr, which is strategically brilliant. The White House shares with the people of the World (not just the USA), the life and work of the President and his closest advisors. The tool is so powerful that even I find myself smiling when I browse though most photos of Obama...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/whitehouse

President Barack Obama leads his daughter Sasha through the Kremlin after the family arrived in Moscow, Russia, July 6, 2009. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)
Friday, 17 July 2009
The Least Free Places on Earth - Photo Essay by Foreign Policy Magazine
Click here for the link to the photo essay
Below are some of the most poignant photos:
Chad

Cuba

Zimbabwe

Sudan (Darfur)

Uzbekistan

Monday, 8 June 2009
Lebanese Parliamentary Elections - 2009
Today, Monday, was declared a national public holiday, again in anticipation of possible security concerns, in the event that the defeated parties contest the results, which also still has not happened.
This morning I woke up and read that early results show a lead of 71 seats out of 128 for the ruling coalition, March 14th, Saad Hariri's group. As final results emerge today, let's see how a possible national unity government could be created while avoiding any future political crisis, which brought the country to a political standstill 2 years ago... We are also expecting reactions from the various international allies of both groups, namely the West including the USA for March 14th and Syria and Iran for March 8th.
On election day yesterday Sunday, I walked around Ashrafieh (the Christian area of East Beirut) to capture a few photos of this historical event:
Two young supporters of the Tayyar Party (orange party) of Christian leader Michel Aoun in Ashrafieh, pose for me with their inked thumb, sign they just voted. Michel Aoun has split with other Christian parties (who are part of the majority March 14th group) and formed the March 8th opposition coalition with Hezbollah...

Security measures were put in place. I took this photo, one street down from our flat in Ashrafieh.

Soldiers were also placed at strategic areas such as infront of polling stations.

Posters of parliamentary candidates were hanging from buildings and some walls were painted in the colour of the party, seen here for Michel Aoun's Tayyar Party. In the background, there is the beautiful maronite church.


Below is a poster of the late Gebrane Tueni, son of Ghassan Tueni who is still the Editor of An-Nahar newspaper and former minister as well as former Lebanese Ambassador to the UN in the crucial years in the beginning of the 1980s when Israel invaded Lebanon. I am reading Ghassan's book "Une guerre pour les autres" which he wrote in 1984 and which is dedicated to his son Gebrane, slain during the war. The woman next to Gebrane is Nayla Tueni, running for a Christian seat in Beirut 1 district, where we live. She is the daughter of Ghassan Tueni. She is one of few women running for parliamentary seats, most of whom are daughters, sisters or wives of Lebanon's political dynasties. As the title of a recent documentary on Al Jazeera English says: "Lebanese Elections: A Family Affair"...

In Lebanon, confession and religion plays a central role in public life. Indeed, even civil marriages are not recognised. When a Lebanese citizen registers a new born, he declares the baby's confession. When adult, that person will vote as a Christian Maronite for example, or as a Sunni Muslim, not only has a Lebanese. The Consitution was written in 1932 and was based on granting equal participation to the 18 official sects and no population census has taken place since then. Seats in parliament are divided equally between Muslims and Christians. As a result, relgion and state are intertwined, religious leaders have tremendous political power and lines between confessional beliefs and public policy are blurred.

Today, as the hours advance, official results are confirming that March 14 has a clear majority. The Israeli foreign minister has already made a statement stressing the importance for the new Lebanese government to prevent attacks from its territory towards Israel.
Until now, Hezbollah has been reacting positively to the election results, admitting defeat. Hezbollah MP Fadlallah made some quite mature and peacefull statements today calling for national unity and respect for diversity. Let's hope Lebanon's political leaders can all overcome past grievances and move on with building democratic institutions with full accountability to Lebanon's people.
Monday, 16 February 2009
Beirut commemorates: 4 years since Hariri's assassination
Friday, 23 January 2009
UN Secretary-General in Gaza
Sunday, 18 January 2009
Gaza Conflict Day 22: Unilateral cease-fire and Crimes against Humanity

Last night, at 2am local time, after a long cabinet meeting, the Israeli government finally decided on a unilateral cease-fire. The question is, a cease-fire with who? As Israel does not recognise Hamas, it cannot negotiate any kind of deal with the group. Another question is how a cease-fire can be unilateral? If only one party agrees to halt fighting, how does this ensure that the conflict actually does stop? And in the case of Palestine, what about freedom, the right of return for the refugees, the right to land and to control of their own borders? What about the right to be free of occupation? And finally, what about the right to an independent state?
Well this morning's events proves these questions to be relevent. Indeed, as reported on Israel's English daily The Haaretz online, IDF and Hamas gunmen traded fire after Hamas launched more rockets into Israel, despite the cease-fire. Furthermore, according to Ehud Olmert, Israeli troops will remain in the Strip (occupying once again that land) as long as Hamas continues to fire rockets.
When I read international media, I find it surprising how this conflict is portrayed and even more surprising how Hamas and its actions are described. Why does everyone think that Hamas is firing rockets just because it feels like it and just because its members are blood thirsty terrorists? Even European media does not get to the bottom of the story. That is actually the problem with journalism, short stories portraying some facts (not all) and never reminding us of the root causes and the history. In the context of the Israel-Palestine conflict, history is very important.
Since Israel's onslaught on Gaza, international law professionals and intellectuals, including Richard Falk, the Princeton professor who was appointed UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the Palestinian territories occupied since 1967, have brought up the issue of potential legal action against Israel for war crimes and crimes against humanity. This of course all depends on how the US will veto these attempts.
According to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Crimes against humanity, "are particularly odious offences in that they constitute a serious attack on human dignity or grave humiliation or a degradation of one or more human beings. They are not isolated or sporadic events, but are part either of a government policy (although the perpetrators need not identify themselves with this policy) or of a wide practice of atrocities tolerated or condoned by a government or a de facto authority. However, murder, extermination, torture, rape, political, racial, or religious persecution and other inhumane acts reach the threshold of crimes against humanity only if they are part of a widespread or systematic practice. Isolated inhumane acts of this nature may constitute grave infringements of human rights, or depending on the circumstances, war crimes, but may fall short of falling into the category of crimes under discussion."
War Crimes are grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions which includes among other acts, harming civilians, destroying property, directing attacks at UN and humanitarian facilities and staff, settling on occupied territory and using poisonous weapons. Does this not sound all too familiar lately?
Sunday, 11 January 2009
The Gaza Conflict - Day 16
Hezbollah also warned Israel once again that it is well prepared to defend Lebanon against any attack on that front.
Thursday, 8 January 2009
The Gaza Conflict - Day 13

There are concerns here in Beirut, that the crisis could spread to Northern Israel on the border with Lebanon.
As reported in the above BBC article, today, Palestinian groups in South Lebanon fired 5 Katyusha rockets into Israel. Israel fired back in response. Hezbollah said it did not plan to start a new war with Israel, but it seems like today's event shows that Palestinian groups are the ones who could start a conflict. There is a heavy UN presence in South Lebanon after the cease-fire in 2006 between Hezbollah and Israel, but it seems as if they would not be able to stop an escalation if there is one. This also means that if it is the Palestinians who are causing trouble, they could be targeted in an Israeli retaliation. There are many Palestinian camps around Beirut and around the country. They are already suffering terrible living conditions as well as social and economic discrimination. Further deterioration of their living conditions will only plunger more into destitution.
Rashid Khalidi, a respected Palestinian scholar in the United States has published a brilliant Op-Ed in the New York Times: Click here. The NYT, with its overly Israeli supportive readership, has published this article in a rare moment of truth about the plight of Palestinians in Gaza.
Jimmy Carter also spoke out in an article in the Washington Post today: Click here. He recently visited the region under the auspices of his Carter Center, in attempt to spread peace in the Middle East. He gave a lecture at the American University of Beirut which M and I attended.
Robert Fisk wrote an opinion piece in The Independent yesterday which I also recommend reading: Click here. In reference to the bombing of the UN school earlier this week he writes: "What happened was not just shameful. It was a disgrace. Would war crime be too strong a description? For that is what we would call this atrocity if it had been committed by Hamas."
Wednesday, 7 January 2009
The Regional Implications of the Gaza Conflict
Overview of the Crisis
On 19 December 2008, an Egyptian brokered cease-fire between Hamas and Israel came to an end after 6 months of relative calm. Continued unmet demands from both sides, saw an escalation to open conflict, now in its 12th day. With over 550 Palestinian deaths and 1 Israeli soldier killed, the ensuing humanitarian crisis and potential regional implications are significant. The already dwindling public infrastructure has been further damaged and in some cases destroyed by Israeli bombardments and artillery shell, including UNRWA facilities and government buildings. International diplomatic efforts have been underway to bring about an immediate cease-fire. After a number of unsuccessful attempts by the Security Council to reach an agreement, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak and French President Nicolas Sarkozy jointly proposed a plan on Tuesday 6 January which would bring together all the main parties and take all measures to end the conflict in Gaza. The plan envisages the resumption of the delivery of aid to Gaza and talks with Israel on border security.
The regional implications of this crisis are mainly political. Indeed, the humanitarian and economic crisis in Gaza, while it affects Gaza and its inhabitants tremendously, does not have much spill-over effects on its neighbours. Furthermore, due to the movement restrictions imposed on the Palestinians in Gaza, they are unable to flee the war and therefore this crisis has not created a large scale refugee problem that neighbouring states would have to cope with. The following describes other regional implications.
Regional Impact
Peace Process
Recent efforts to revive the peace process were made in 2007, when the Arab League renewed its commitment to the Arab Peace Initiative, presented in Beirut in 2002 by the Crown Prince King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia. The initiative which includes a return to the 1967 borders and a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital was widely accepted by Arab countries, including the Palestinian Authority as well as support from Israel. The PA recently published the details of this peace plan in Israeli print media, in an effort of rapprochement to inform the Israeli population. Parellel initiatives were pushed by the United States last year, namely the Annapolis process which lead to a Conference in November 2007, aiming to produce a substantive document on resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict along the lines of President George W. Bush's Roadmap For Peace, with the eventual establishment of a Palestinian state.
The current crisis in Gaza will have dire consequences on the ongoing peace process, as previous confidence building efforts between the Palestinian Authority and Israel on one side, and third party brokered cease-fires between Hamas and Israel on the other side, would have been in vein. This crisis will also create a potential for further radicalization of certain groups within Palestinian society, leading to increased risk of continued violence and conflict. The marginalization of some key Arab countries such as Egypt and Syria, as a result of their response for some and silence for others during this crisis, will also further burden any future efforts for renewed peace talks. On the other hand, the recent joint efforts made by Arab States at the Security Council on pushing for a cease-fire, shows a potential for unified efforts and support for peace.
The crisis will also have negative consequences on internal reconciliation efforts between various factions within Palestinian society. The failure to convene the Palestinian Reconciliation Dialogue in Cairo last November, already demonstrated its fragile grounds. Since Hamas’ election in 2005, the group has been in a power struggle with the Fateh party, led by Mahmoud Abbass. In July 2007, Hamas seized control of the Gaza Strip, ousting Fateh, which currently controls the West Bank. Following the take over of power in the Strip, continuing internal fighting between various Palestinian factions had intensified. The current crisis however has resulted in increasing Palestinian support for Hamas.
Neighbouring states
Egypt
In 2005, after the Israeli disengagement of Gaza, Egypt and the Palestinian Authority were responsible for controlling the Rafah Crossing in the presence of EU monitors, following an agreement on Movement and Access with Israel. As a result of the abduction of IDF soldier, Gilat Shalit in 2006 and continued military aggression from both Israel and Hamas, Rafah, as all other crossings into Gaza were restricted and under the control of the Israeli authorities.
Egypt’s position first as an ally of Israel and second as a country with a border with the Gaza Strip, has faced difficult times, especially more recently with the conflict that has erupted in Gaza. Egypt’s initial decision to deny access to its country to fleeing Palestinians has been criticized by most of the Arab world. Egypt’s current responsibility for the movement of Palestinians, its obligation to deal directly with Hamas to solve the border crisis while it continues to maintain ties with the West and with Israel, has created an environment of uncertainty and instability. On the other hand, its direct links to Hamas, does provide a third party mediator between the warring parties.
Lebanon
The conflict between Hezbollah and Israeli forces which took place in the summer of 2006 is a reminder that continued tensions exist between two well-armed foes. Hezbollah’s leader has recently spoken out against Israel’s actions in Gaza, as has most Lebanese political leaders. More recently, Israel’s Prime Minister has confirmed that its forces are ready in the North for any possible retaliation from Hezbollah. Speculation as to ties which exist between Hezbollah and Hamas, especially in terms of arms supply and training, has increased further these tensions. Lebanon, which is recovering from a tense previous 2 years, is not in the position to suffer from further instability, if an escalation were to take place between Israel and Hezbollah.
Humanitarian and Economic
Gaza has been subject to a blockage for already 18 months prior to the beginning of the current crisis, crippling its economy to a state of almost entire dependency on humanitarian and external aid. The effect of the ongoing bombardments and land operations on its infrastructure, water supply systems and basic utilities, will be unprecedented once a damage evaluation is undertaken when a cease-fire is put in place. This region is already burdened by crises of even higher proportions such as the ongoing displacement situation as a result of the Iraq war, the continuous inflow of refugees into Egypt mainly from Sudan, but increasingly from Iraq as well, the Palestinian issue in Lebanon which resulted in the destruction of a refugee camp last year in the North, the recent conflict in Yemen and ongoing tensions between Syria, Iran and Israel. In addition to these crises, the global economic crisis has also affected the countries in this region with high inflation rates and drastic decreases in oil revenues. Therefore, in these difficult times, enhanced regional cooperation cannot be overemphasized. It is the regional nature of this conflict that should be taken into consideration when Arab states decide to take action. Furthermore, the financial crisis will also result in western donor governments’ aid fatigue and therefore will require increased support from Arab states to assist in the recovery of Gaza in the short term and the economic development of the Strip in the longer term. This crisis is an opportunity for the Arab world to demonstrate its capacity to unify and work together on this important issue.
******